Highlights:
- Bard is an AI-powered chatbot mimicking human conversations through machine learning and natural language processing with internet-sourced responses.
- OpenAI’s ChatGPT has GPT-4 as its language model, while Bard has LaMDA as its language model.
In the fast-evolving world of AI chatbots, two contenders have emerged as frontrunners – ChatGPT and Bard. The first AI chatbot that shattered the internet was ChatGPT, but Google Bard is now a powerful competitor. Both can produce responses to questions. When appropriately used, ChatGPT and Google Bard can support various business operations, including creating and developing content.
As we explore the world of conversational AI chatbots, a detailed discussion of ChatGPT Vs. Bard is necessary to understand their unique advantages, disadvantages, and potential effects on various industries.
Let’s identify the key distinctions and affinities between these two imposing competitors vying for the title of the top chatbot. Before diving into a comprehensive guide of ChatGPT Vs. Bard, let’s first understand each separately.
What Is ChatGPT?
The AI-powered chatbot, ChatGPT, uses machine learning to respond to questions in natural language. Just after its launch, Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, said ChatGPT reached a million users in just five days. Imagine the buzz it created worldwide!
Using text prompts, it produces responses that resemble those of a human. A sizable text dataset was used to train the system, including Common Crawl, Wikipedia, books, articles, documents, and content scraped from the open internet.
All users of ChatGPT can use it for free, but ChatGPT Plus, which offers access during peak hours, quicker response times, priority access to new features, and use of GPT-4, is billed at USD 20 per month. Let’s understand its competitor.
What Is Google Bard?
Google Bard chatbot can respond to queries and produce text in response to prompts, just like ChatGPT.
Additionally, it is a chatbot powered by AI that mimics human conversations using machine learning, natural language processing, and responses from the internet.
Infiniset, a data set that includes Common Crawl, Wikipedia, documents, and conversations and dialogues from the web, was used to train Bard. Users with access can use Bard without charge.
Much like digital aides such as Alexa and Siri, Bard’s primary aim is to swiftly provide information with direct responses rather than presenting a search engine results page. However, it goes a step further by offering users supplementary links for delving deeper into the topic if they desire to explore further.
First debating ChatGPT Vs. Bard, and then choosing the best chatbot for your needs, has become an exciting choice. Let’s look more closely at both of the cutting-edge technologies to achieve that.
Bard Vs. ChatGPT: Picking the Perfect Chatbot
Examining the differences between Bard Vs. ChatGPT as you start your search for the ideal chatbot will enable you to make a decision that is suited to your unique needs and preferences:
| Category | OpenAI’s ChatGPT | Google’s Bard |
|---|---|---|
| Language model | GPT-4 | LaMDA |
| Sources | It presents information without citing sources. | It offers multiple sourced responses to questions. |
| Conversation tracking | ChatGPT stands out with limitless conversation tracking on the left-hand side, offering easy access and deletion options. | Bard lacks conversation storage and accessibility, only allowing history lookup and search retrieval without direct conversation restart. |
| Debugging | Although ChatGPT finds bugs better, there is still room for improvement. | Bard offers a thorough explanation, potential error corrections, function usage tips, and expected outcomes. |
| Problem-solving | ChatGPT swiftly identifies the answer, offering both a potential fix and a detailed explanation of the issue. | The way Bard solves problems differs less from ChatGPT. |
| Code generation | When examining the code generation, Bard’s code appeared to be more object-oriented. | ChatGPT could adapt to create cleaner solutions and often produced more extensive code for comprehensive solutions. |
| Responses | ChatGPT is an LLM only, and its current code refactoring capabilities may not meet expectations. However, future improvements are anticipated. | Bard, an LLM, leverages search engine data for enhanced refactoring, offering optimized code and showcasing benchmark results. |
| Integration | It incorporates Microsoft Teams and additional services. | It integrates with Google Sheets, Google Docs, and Gmail. |
| Other tasks | Better at generating ideas and performing creative tasks. | A strong summarizer. |
| Supporting languages | The programming languages Python, JavaScript, Java, and a dozen others are supported by ChatGPT. | Google claims Bard generates code in multiple programming languages, including prompts in natural language. |
Determining the AI chatbot world’s supreme champion amid the competition between ChatGPT and Bard becomes an intriguing task.
ChatGPT Vs. Bard: Choosing the Champion
We talked about the limitations of Bard Vs. ChatGPT and observed how the two AI chatbots behave differently in the same situation. Each technology has access to the internet and uses a different learning methodology.
When it comes to dependable and up-to-date information, Google Bard emerges as the clear frontrunner. On the other hand, for tasks demanding efficiency and innovative thinking, ChatGPT proves to be a more proficient choice.
While evaluating ChatGPT vs. Bard, we have emphasized how both models continue to get updates over time. Google is delaying the release of its most potent language models for the time being, so a more competitive Google product may be on the horizon. To support modern workspace, the field of generative AI is strengthening business branches.
Delve into the technological trends and best practices through our comprehensive tech-related whitepaper library.
